Thursday, October 26, 2017

Hayward on the Hatchery Lease...Castille says its a Better Deal than the Maritime Park

Rick Outzen asks the Mayor if the Fish Hatchery is the best use of the Bruce Beach property.  Ther Mayor says maybe not but its something.

Then Colleen Castille tells Outzen the Fish Hatchery is a better deal for the City than the Maritime Park.

"At least we are getting $1 a year.  That's $299,999 more than we are getting for the Maritime Park"

At least the Wahoos in the stadium don't need a settlement pond for their poo!

Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktLgX8hg4Fo

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Hayward Document Quotes on New Stinky Fish Hatchery

From documents on the City's Fish Hatchery "Transparency Page".  Its in black and white so no excuses for anyone now.




  • Building a wetland to filter nutrients, return clean water to the bay, and supply plants for future habitat restoration projects.
  • Conceptual site design includes indoor facility, stormwater ponds, storage pond for solids settling out, and treatment marsh.
  • Marsh and settlement ponds could be incorporated into the site usage with a boardwalk.
  • Waste removal: Round tanks with bottom-center drains concentrate waste. Fish waste includes solid waste, liquid waste (NH3), and gas waste (CO2).
  • Round tanks “self-clean” and are well-mixed. Rotational current around tank (primary current) affects radial flow (secondary current). Radial current transports wastes to center drain. Rotational flow dependent on water pumping rate.
  • Tank height and diameter ratio affects waste transport; about 3:1 height to diameter ratio is ideal. More fish produce more waste and need larger reconditioning systems. Amount of fish directs waste management plan. Waste removed continuously through mechanical pumping or biological removal, and solid waste filters that separate solids from water.
  • Solid waste removal: Filters are efficient at removing particles from water. Foam fractionators can remove very small particles.
  • Liquid waste removal: Fish produce ammonia (NH3) as liquid waste, which is toxic. Nitrifying bacteria use ammonia as food (nitrification).
  • NO3 is minimally toxic, used by marsh plants and anaerobic bacteria.

    • Nitrifiers grow in water, but need surface to adhere to and need a “biological filter.” Vessel/tank biofilter packed with highly porous material for nitrifying bacteria to colonize.
    • Gas waste (CO2) respired through gills, a fish metabolic end product. Negative effects on fish health if excess carbon dioxide acidifies the water. Forced gas ventilation of water with a “degassing box” increases gas exchange efficiency. Laminar flow passes water across trays and forces ambient air across the water and carries out the CO2.
    • Pumps (0.25-5 horsepower) are required to transport water and wastes.
      • High energy demand.
      • One-phase power or three-phase power.
      • Larger tanks with more fish require larger pumps, larger pipes, longer distance from tanks to filtration system, and more energy.

  • A large amount of O2 is critical to produce juvenile fish. High tech filtration works 24 hours a day. Largest water source, largest biomass, and largest amount of waste.
  • Wastewater management plan for tanks and also for discharge.

    • Solids, nitrogen, and approved chemicals for parasite removal if necessary.

  • Solids removed from effluent by ponds or tanks used to settle waste to the bottom or filtration systems that use concentration and remove waste to a drying area, then to a landfill.
  • For removing nitrate: 1) anaerobic bacteria nitrification, 2) marsh plants are a proven method with environmental benefits, or 3) sewer for specific small volume discharges only; depends on city, county and state permits required. An injection well is not a preferred method.

  • Just what we need downtown! 

    Hayward's legacy! The Prince of POO!


    Monday, October 23, 2017

    CRA Control of Bruce Beach

    The CRA Administrator sent the following email to Council Member Myers:


    From: Helen Gibson
    Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 10:33 AM
    To: Sherri Myers
    Cc: Victoria D’Angelo
    Subject: RE: Please give me a call

    Good Morning, Board Member Myers. The CRA has never been a party to the Fish Hatchery lease. The property was purchased by the City of Pensacola in 1974, and no CRA funds were ever allocated to it. The CRA statutes do not apply.

    M. Helen Gibson, AICP
    CRA Administrator

    HOLD THE PHONE HELEN!

    FORTIS COUNCIL FILES 01/10/2002 Over the past two years, the CRA Staff coordinated several planning efforts that identified additional capital projects proposed to be constructed in the next three to five years to continue the CRA's partnership approach to revitalization within the Urban Core Community Redevelopment Area:
      • Palafox Pier Plaza
      • Sidewalk Partnership Fund
      • Reconstruction of Baylen Street Walkway
      • Expanded Commercial Facade Grant Program
      • Bruce Beach Site Improvements
      • Main Street Sewage Treatment Plant Relocation Evaluation


















    Friday, October 20, 2017

    Leases...Council Must Approve Changes...Until Hayward Decides They Don't

    The unbelievable amount of fish "nutrients" that Mayor Hayward and email snitch Olson are spewing over this fish hatchery lease is comical.

    Below are lease facts regarding the City.  They are indisputable.

    When Bob Kerrigan's lease at the airport needed to be amended to allow subleasing, Council had to approve.

    When Julian McQueen wanted to assign his lease at the airport to Pensacola Aviation, Council had to approve.

    When Offshore Inland wanted to change their long term rental agreement to dump a warehouse, agree to a balloon payment for back rent and reduce their future rent payments, Council had to approve.

    When Offshore Inland couldn't make their balloon payment and needed another concession, Council had to approve.

    When Resicum needed their uses amended at the Airport to allow for helicopter flight training, Council had to approve.

    When FWC voids its lease specifically as detailed in the document regarding commencement of construction, NO COUNCIL APPROVAL IS NEEDED.

    Here is my take:

    • Olson was the initiative coordinator over this Rick Scott accommodation before he was overpromoted.  He had and has no idea what he is doing in his job.
    • Hayward got his PR win back in 2011 when he called his emergency meeting and got conceptual approval
    • The FWC got its PR win back in 2011 when they got the BP funds earmarked.
    • This project has been number 97 on both the City and the FWC's  top 100 to do list since 2014.
    • Someone woke up in February and figured out that the FWC was waaaaaay behind glideslope on this project and put in the bull "nutrient" permit so that something was in the system.
    • When the PNJ started looking, Olson exclaimed "Oh "Nutrient"!
    • Then the lease was reviewed and the lease was actually VOID under the LDC definition of construction.  Olson said "Holy Nutrient"
    • Then the CRA requirement and angle was pointed out by the PNJ as detailed in today's article.
    • When it was pointed out to him yesterday by the reporter, Olson must have called Hayward and said "  We are in deep "Nutrient"!
    Folks!  This is a typical Ashton Hayward real estate project! 

    One big sad pile of "Nutrient"!





    Thursday, October 19, 2017

    Hayward and FWC Full of Nutrients...By the Way the Permit you are Holding On To As Proof...EXPIRED

    Let's unpack the FWC & Mayoral JOINT statement:

    “The City of Pensacola and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) agree that construction commenced as contemplated, that no violations of the lease have occurred and that the project is moving forward as planned.

    Olson pedaled these "nutrients" in an intimidation letter to Council as well:

    "In short, we are in agreement with FWC that construction commenced as contemplated and that the project is moving forward as planned. If you have questions about the status of the project or any of its individual elements, I encourage you to contact Keith Wilkins."

    "At the time the project was discussed, the parties were aware that the project required public meetings and other agency involvement."

    Where is the MOU???   There is construction set to proceed before an MOU is in place?  What if they disagree on the MOU?

    "Thus the lease, as approved, balanced the risk of undue delay or stagnation with a negotiated provision for commencement of construction as agreed to by the parties to trigger a completion of construction deadline."

    Code for "don't want to take ANYTHING back to City Council" because it will lose.

    "The City has been apprised of FWC’s progress throughout, and the parties are in agreement that the completion of construction deadline is February 14, 2020."

    OOPS...10 years after the spill that the hatchery was meant to assist in the recovery for and 9 years after Hayward brought the lame brained plan to Council in the first place, the building is to be completed.

    A decade after the spill.

    As seen above, the Preliminary Permit EXPIRED Sept 12, 2017.  So no valid permit is open on this project.  But construction has commenced.

    To not honor the lease would be a violation of the contract.”

    Terms of the lease have been VIOLATED

    The lease is VOID

    Hayward is running this project about as successfully as Redfish Harbour.  

    Wednesday, October 18, 2017

    Fish Hatchery...The Facts!!


    • On June 20, 2011, Mayor Hayward called a special Council meeting to discuss the fish hatchery lease.  In the request for the meeting, the Mayor's office stated: "Request on behalf of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, in conjunction with partners such as Hubbs Seaworld Research Institute and Motes Marine Laboratory"
    • Since this emergency special meeting Seaworld and Motes have disappeared.
    • The proposal stated: "The facility will be one of a network of Gulf Coast fisheries, habitats and education research and restoration facilities"
    • SIX YEARS LATER, where is the "network"?
    • When he addressed the Council in June 2011, OVER 6 YEARS AGO, the official minutes reflect Mayor Hayward stating "TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE"
    • The proposal was for "sportfish species such as red snapper, red drum and spotted trout"
    • In fact, two separate city-sponsored studies recommended a best use for the Bruce Beach site. Both the URAC report, released in fall 2012, and the Community Redevelopment Agency Plan, released two years prior, recommended that the property be reserved for recreational use and public bay access.
    • Three "time is of the essence" years later a LEASE WAS BROUGHT FORWARD.
    • The Council Memorandum present in 2014 stated:
    " FWC will construct a state-of-the art saltwater fish hatchery for the production of sportfish species on the site along with a filtration marsh that will recycle nutrients from the hatchery and serve as a nursery for wetland plant species to support ongoing regional habitat restoration."

    First anchor drop...NUTRIENTS EQUALS FISH POO AND GROUND UP DEAD FISH!

    Next quote:

    "All improvements will be consistent with the requirements of the Waterfront Redevelopment District as designated by the City of Pensacola Land Development Code with the Green Building Certification Ordinance"

    Second anchor drop...If the City approves a building permit for their current site plan, it will be in violation of the City's Land Development Code. The hatchery does not have an urban form, it will be located too far back from Main St. and has the parking in front. Additionally, the hatchery site is located within an area of the city called the "dense business area". In 2009, the planning board and then council unanimously approved a maximum 10' setback in the dense business area. It's intention was to create a more walkable downtown by forcing buildings to be up close to the street and parking to the side or rear--since 10' wouldn't leave enough space for parking in front. City staff has not been enforcing the 10' max setback and did not bring it up when hatchery was considered. City staff agreed that the 10' setback applied to the hatchery. Yet the City has a planning board-approved site plan that is in violation of city code. If the City issues a building permit for the site as their plan currently exists, it will be in violation of the city's land development code.

    In the least enthusiastic approval of an item in City history, Council approved the land lease anyway in a 5-3 vote.
    • Councilmember Bare voted NO!
    • Councilmember Myers voted NO!
    • Councilmember Pratt voted NO!
    • During the lease discussion, Councilmember Brian Spencer stated “I’m skeptical of its economic impact."
    • During the lease discussion, Councilmember Larry B. Johnson stated: “I’m still considering if this is the highest and best use for that property,” he said, suggesting that more research be conducted before a vote is taken. “Maybe it’s time someone on the council gets on a plane and goes to look at a hatchery similar to this one,” he said.
    • During the lease discussion, Councilmember PC Wu stated: “I’m mixed,” Councilor P.C. Wu said “If everything works out, I’d like to have it here. I just don’t know if Bruce Beach is the right location.” While Wu still embraces the potential environmental and science value of the project, he wondered, “Does a dollar a- year lease for waterfront property and so few jobs make sense on the merits?


    • Ken Ford, director of the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition questioned whether a hatchery was the “best use” of the property. “Think of any successful waterfront city to which we aspire comparison,” Ford said. “How many of these cities feature hatcheries as a driver of their economic engine?”
    The lease states, in English:

    " Section 20. Performance Schedule.  Time is of the essence of this lease, and in case the Commission shall fail to perform the covenants on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of each respective covenants by the provisions of the lease, City may declare Tenant to be in default of such Lease and Immediately terminate the lease.  Barring any unforeseen delays due to site conditions or Force Majeure, as defined in Section 36 below,  Commission shall commence construction of the Center, the public waterfront access and public recreation facilities no later than three (3) years of the execution of this Lease.  Should the Commission fail to commence construction...on or before three (3) years of the execution date of this lease, the Commission hereby expressly agrees to immediately forfeit all property interests and any rights under this lease and occupation of the premises and the Lease shall be VOID.

    Fast forward to the issue of has FWC violated the lease:

    The City's LDC defines construction as "Construction (Chapter 12-9, Stormwater Management and Control of Erosion, Sedimentation and Runoff) means any on-site activity which will result in the creation of a new stormwater discharge facility, including the building, assembling, expansion, modification or alteration of the existing contours of the site, the erection of buildings or other structures, or any part thereof, or land clearing.


    Therefore, under the 2014 lease....it is void!

    More to come!



    Monday, October 16, 2017

    Wow! Does B. stand for Bold?

    City Councilman Larry B. Johnson responds to Andy Marlette's Saturday cartoon on his Facebook page:

    LBJ says:
    Always a good day when I make an Andy Marlette cartoon. I let Andy and Quint Studer at PNJ management (know) that I had a good laugh. Ever since Quint took over the PNJ it's been a lot easier to know where he stands politically, on issues like the Pelicans, fish hatchery, etc. It will be interesting to see who Quint and the PNJ support in the 2018 elections!




















    https://www.facebook.com/LarryBJohnsonD4/

    Ding Ding!

    Lllllllllletttt's Get Ready to Rumbllllllllllle!

    More Articles on Fish Hatcheries

    http://www.squamishchief.com/lifestyles/afternoon-with-the-fish-1.16024954

    “You get to see the best of both worlds. You get to see what the government is doing in terms of trying to enhance the stocks up in the Squamish area, but you can also see [the fish] doing their own business as well, which is a huge draw,” he said, though adding in December the area “reeks” because there’s thousands of carcasses in the lake.
    After so many years working with fish, Smith said he still usually enjoys eating salmon, but not during spawning season when the smell of the rotting fish pervades. 
    After smelling rotting fish all day he doesn’t have the stomach to cook salmon once he gets home, he said with a laugh.
    New Stinky!

    http://99wfmk.com/paristower2017/

    When you get to Paris, look for the fish hatchery…if you can’t see it, you’ll probably smell it. The tower is just past the hatchery, but you’ll have to get outta the car and walk through the woods for a couple of minutes before you come across it. I visited this area some years ago and it was an interesting little side trip.

    New Stinky!

    Thursday, October 12, 2017

    Sisson False Claims of Degree? Here we go again!

    Attached is the employee file of Edward Franklin Sisson.  It will reflect that he a self promoter and is always looking for ways to "pad" his own employee file.

    Sisson-Personnel-File

    It contains:

    • His contract with the Mayor
    • His list of achievements which includes firing people
    • His payroll changes and adjustments
    • His personal email address...edwardfsisson@hotmail.com
    • His permission to teach motorcycle safety at night and on the weekends
    Heck, it contains his fiance and mama's addresses and phone numbers.

    What it does NOT contain:
    • a resume or
    • an application
    So...absent any additional documentation that the man who wants to make sure everything he sees as beneficial is included in his employee file...we, the Citizens, must take Mr. Sisson's previous work history at his word.  

    That has worked in the past hasn't it?

    Well what is his word?


    Edward F. Sisson currently serves as the Chief Human Resources Officer. He holds a degree in Human Resources along with 15+ years experience working in small, medium, and large companies, in both for-profit and not-for-profit environments. His industry experience includes consulting, manufacturing, municipal government, benefits outsourcing, higher education, and healthcare.

    He has a strong background working in the public sector of Human Resources and his experience includes working in generalist, specialist, and managerial roles. Prior to the City of Pensacola, Edward worked as a Human Resource Business Partner with Alabama Medicaid, Alabama Department of Transportation, the City of Jacksonville, Florida, and Hillsborough County Civil Service Office.

    Edward earned a Bachelor Degree of Science majoring in Psychology at Troy University and has secured four professional certifications to include: Senior Professional of Human Resources (SPHR), Certified Employee Benefits Specialist (CEBS), Retirement Plans Associate (RPA), and Group Benefits Associate (GBA).

    Hmm! Anyone see the discrepancy?

    Evidently the man has two degrees! 

    One in Human Resources which would qualify him for his current job.

    And one in Psychology which is nice but would be irrelevant to his current role.

    Which is it Ed? Human Resources, Psychology? How do we know if you have a degree at all?

    For all we know you could have been running trailer parks in the greater Tallahassee area before coming here.

    Only Jose knows!  And he doesn't look like he is telling.






    Tuesday, October 10, 2017

    Who's the City's insurance broker of record?

    On September 27, 2017, the following memo was sent to City Council




















    A few weeks ago, Jim Odom, the City's long time insurance broker of record passed away.  This is an advertised RFQ position.   I was wondering who is presently serviing in that role and made the following records request.

    On September 27 the City Administrator issued a memo informing Council of the Mayor purchasing insurance policies.  Who was the selling insurance agent for each policy listed in the memorandum.  Additionally, with Mr. Odom passing away who is the City's agent of record since his passing?  When is the agent of record due to be rebid?

    The response I got?

    The City of Pensacola has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive records or documents to your request for public records.

    How can the City no longer have a Broker of Record?

    Insurance guys, any insight here?

    Tuesday, October 3, 2017

    Brittany Forge, Lavallet...Strap it On. Your World is about to Change!

    On 9/28/2017, an amendment was made to the lease between the City of Pensacola and Resicum International LLC.

    The amendment simply added flight training to the existing lease.

    Whats the issue?

    I posted this before

    http://pensacolad3.blogspot.com/2017/04/consent-agendaright-under-councils-nose.html

    It was a Bob Kerrigan sweetheart deal!

    Now the UH-60s are not only going to be maintained as listed in the original lease, but helicopter flight training is now OK!

    Test Pilot?  What happens when the test fails?
    Instructor Pilot?  Students?  OJT?

    What could possibly go wrong?

    Noise  - 85 decibels in hover  http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a118796.pdf

    Hearing Loss  A bulldozer that is idling (note that this is idling, not actively bulldozing) is loud enough at 85 dB that it can cause permanent damage after only 1 work day (8 hours).

    http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/noise-induced-hearing-loss/


    A Current Job Listing

    Maintenance Test Pilot and Instructor Pilot – UH-60M

    Pensacola, Florida • 01-03-2017
    Job Description:
    Perform the duties of maintenance test pilot to support a Rotary Wing Flight Academy.  Perform the duties of a maintenance test pilot specific to the UH-60M.
    Prepare reports and communications as needed.
    Perform duties as an instructor to instruct UH-60M familiarization and maintenance check courses as needed to backfill instructors.
    Other duties as required.

    Education and Experience:
     
    • Graduate of the UH-60M MAINTENANCE TEST PILOT Course, Ft. Rucker
    • Minimum of 1000 hours Pilot in Command, 100 hours in UH 60M, and 300 hours in similar aircraft type (UH 60M/A/L)
    • UH-60M Instructor Pilot Course Graduate Desired
    • Minimum five years’ demonstrable experience as a Maintenance Test Pilot, with minimum of one year on the UH-60M.
    • Experience as an Instructor Pilot/Flight Examiner preferred; experience teaching and working with foreign students highly preferred


    Certifications 

    FAA Commercial/Instrument PILOT- Rotorcraft;
    CFI preferred

    Other:
    • Must be able to pass background check
    • Must be flexible and work well with others
    • Excellent Oral and Written communication skills
    • Demonstrated ability to meet reporting requirements and all deadlines
    • Excellent customer management skills
    • Demonstrated Leadership Skills
    • Working knowledge of Microsoft Office Suite
    • Ability to delegate effectively

    Location:  Pensacola, FL
    Resicum International LLC is a veteran owned small business and equal opportunity employer.  We offer competitive compensation packages, a good work environment and the opportunity to grow with our small business.  Find out more about us by visiting www.resicuminternational.com

    Salary Range: Market Competitive
    Relocation: Negotiable
    Start Date:  Immediate
    Travel: N/A