Read again Mr. Kerrigan, I merely ask the question if you are involved based on your presence at Beggs & Lane. Please provide what statements I have made that are false. Please cut and paste the statements of concern into a post. I will either substantiate or retract. Also, please remember that questions I ask are not statements. I am simply questioning Government as you have done for years. We are both public figures and surely you understand the need for the truth to be shared.
Your statement that "By the way I have never met Mr. Glover and I have never ever said a word about or against him." was proven false in your last edition of your Bowling News. You remember. The edition you pulled down off your blog??
Mr. Kerrigan, if you were not there regarding the Chief's investigation why were you there?
- A witness places you outside VanSickle's office while the questioning was occurring.
- Photos and witnesses confirm you were there multiple days while the report was being prepared.
- You withdrew as Co-Council in the Fish House case months ago so there was no reason for you to be involved with that case.
If you were there working on the City request for rehearing, who directed you to be there? Do you have an engagement letter or co-counsel agreement? If its related to City business, it's a public document. Just provide it.
For the record, if you review my blog you will see that I never stated you were there about the Chief's but simply providing facts as to your presence at Beggs and Lane and asking the question as to if it was related to the Chiefs.
Shed some light Mr. Kerrigan and when you do I will gladly post the information.